On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 05:48:00PM -0500, Denny White wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:48:58AM -0400, Dan Harnett spoke thusly: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02:35AM -0500, Denny White wrote: > > > Okay, dumb-ass me. Sitting here looking at the screen it finally > > > dawned on me I'm not looking at 2 physical cpu's, per se, but > > > instead 2 built onto one chip. Gee, I wish I would've come up > > > with that beforehand instead of opening my mouth and removing > > > any doubt in regards to my hardware ignorance. Only thing in > > > my defense is I've never owned anything like that before. Before > > > getting this laptop given to me, my fastest box was an aging dell > > > dimension Pentium IV 2.66. No dual-cores, no dual-cpu's. Time to > > > slink off now. ;) > > > > A processor can have multiple sensors even though it is only a single > > physical package. It varies between processors. > > > > $ sysctl hw.model hw.sensors > > hw.model=Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7500 @ 1.60GHz > > hw.sensors.cpu0.temp0=44.00 degC > > hw.sensors.cpu1.temp0=44.00 degC > > hw.sensors.acpitz0.temp0=45.05 degC (zone temperature) > > hw.sensors.acpitz1.temp0=44.05 degC (zone temperature) > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt0=14.40 VDC (voltage) > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt1=16.53 VDC (current voltage) > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.watthour0=36.62 Wh (last full capacity) > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.watthour1=1.83 Wh (warning capacity) > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.watthour2=0.20 Wh (low capacity) > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.watthour3=36.45 Wh (remaining capacity), OK > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.raw0=0 (battery idle), OK > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.raw1=0 (rate) > > hw.sensors.acpiac0.indicator0=On (power supply) > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp0=45.00 degC (TMP0) > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp1=34.00 degC (TMP1) > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp2=34.00 degC (TMP2) > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp3=38.00 degC (TMP3) > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp4=24.00 degC (TMP4) > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp6=24.00 degC (TMP6) > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.fan0=0 RPM (fan) > > hw.sensors.iwn0.temp0=56.00 degC > > hw.sensors.aps0.temp0=34.00 degC > > hw.sensors.aps0.temp1=34.00 degC > > hw.sensors.aps0.indicator0=On (Keyboard Active) > > hw.sensors.aps0.indicator1=Off (Mouse Active) > > hw.sensors.aps0.indicator2=On (Lid Open) > > hw.sensors.aps0.raw0=507 (X_ACCEL) > > hw.sensors.aps0.raw1=513 (Y_ACCEL) > > hw.sensors.aps0.raw2=507 (X_VAR) > > hw.sensors.aps0.raw3=513 (Y_VAR) > > Yup, so I've learned. Thanks, Dan. Like I said before, never > owned anything that modern before. ;) But, since last night, > I've done a lot of reading up on it. Should've done it before > but I didn't know I was gonna be given a new dual-core laptop. > That doesn't happen very often. Not around here anyway. ;)
It's just that the code creating hw.sensors.cpuX.temp0 is a little different between i386 and amd64, so amd64 shows one sensor for each core (but with the same temperature) while i386 shows only one sensor for all cores.
