On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:11:56 +0700, Claudio Jeker
<cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 01:43:09PM +0700, Insan Praja wrote:
Hi Misc@,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Claudio Jeker
<cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:49:00AM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
>> Hi Misc@,
>> So I tried to move the cable (and configs) to other interfaces.
>> Unplugging the cable will reproduce the problem. So IMHO it must be
>> something in bgpd or something in kernel that manages routes.
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> Could you please send me the output of netstat -Arn just before you
> produce the panic. Hopefully this gives me the hint what goes wrong.
>
It's a lot of output (full routes), but I could cut some of the first
output
I would need the full output but I just saw your PR and there you mention
multiple routing tables. Did you try without multiple tables?
Is bgp writing to an alternate table?
I see if I can reproduce it.
Bgpd use rtable 0. I use multiple routing table to produce VRF/VPN-like
network on my routers. I got rtable 1 and rtable 2. I haven't tested this
with single table. A full "netstat -Arn" output would be a 62.5Mb files, a
don't think it would pass the mailer. Here's a link
http://www.4shared.com/file/80547753/5bb42570/netstat.html for downloading
link.
Thanks,
Insan
--
insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom
