Denis Doroshenko escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950 >> >> Again a mis representation in pulic? >> > > haha, poor linus cries like a baby coz not everyone is gonna kiss his > ass these days. > > of course security is not that important! there is no doubt, we've > seen numerous examples by linux indeed. > > well, guess what is worse: a db server crashed and rebooted, or a db > server rooted and all valuable information sucked out of it. jeez, i > always thought that linux "wants" to get into serious game of big > servers etc., but with the leader like that?.. gimme a break. > > he made my day with that comment! sorry guys for contributing to this, > just couldn't resist :-) > > p.s. i guess dr. freud would find some serious troubles deep in the guy ;-) > > > I took the care of reading all the thread. The guy is just asking linus why the policy about security bugs isn't being followed. Linus replies him telling that he do not want script kiddies to exploit the bugs. He even says that security bugs are "normal" bugs. I think that linus doesn't even know what full disclosure is. It's a shame for me, a linux and openbsd user, to see the linux kernel main developer, saying things like that. I think i might migrate my desktop machine to openbsd now.
My 2 cents, -- Giancarlo Razzolini http://lock.razzolini.adm.br Linux User 172199 Red Hat Certified Engineer no:804006389722501 Verify:https://www.redhat.com/certification/rhce/current/ Moleque Sem Conteudo Numero #002 OpenBSD Stable Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Herom 4386 2A6F FFD4 4D5F 5842 6EA0 7ABE BBAB 9C0E 6B85
