Matthew Szudzik wrote: > > Not true. Language can define the laws of of physics or of > mathematics > in extremely clear, precise, and absolute terms. > First the obvious: If it can, then why doesn't it?
Second, seems like mathematics has "axioms" not "laws". There are a few things you can define with pretty good rigor, not all that easy to do a lot with 'em though. That glib a statement is only made by people who have no concept of clear or of precise or of absolute.
