On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:19:38PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > Nobody out here is going to listen to what you're going to say, and > you are going to go on and on about how you were justified in labeling > OpenBSD as not compliant with your interpretation of the word "free", > which we don't give a farthing for.
He only doesn't want to *recommend* OpenBSD because of the ports tree distributing some (however few exceptions those are) proprietary software. He's not labelling OpenBSD non-free, just non-free-friendly because some non-free are distributed in the ports site. Now, you may disagree with his non-recommendation, but you're misinterperting what's being said completely, and perhaps giving a worse judgement of his words than what he "did" (depending on the point of view). Rui (ps: if someone wants to answer back with insults just shove it, ok? I'm a fan of the Free Software operating system called OpenBSD and it's policy on pro-active security) -- Fnord. Today is Pungenday, the 3rd day of Chaos in the YOLD 3174 + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
