On Dec 16, 2007, at 9:29 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 10:56 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Bengt Frost wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:31:25PM -0700, Darrb
Finally as long as i do not hurt 'someone' (to mutch) then it must
be up to me to choose what i want to do, f.ex. install packages
through
portssystem.
If I wrote a a BSD Licensed program to mailbomb jews.
Would that be acceptable within ports ?
and who exactly would you bribe to get this "mailbomb" committed to
the ports tree?
That is the point!
Why is it that I can not expect ports to accept this ?
Because accepting it would be the same as tacitly endorsing it.
Accepting non-free software is is equivalent to tacitly
endorsing it.
No. Because it's useless and nobody with commit access would want to
put the time and effort into doing so. Please move on.
