On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:52:11AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > > [...] > > Does that make it non-free? > > Even giving the URLs has the effect of referring people to those > non-free programs. It gives those non-free programs legitimacy, > and thus contradicts the idea that "software should be free". >
How comes I can boot Windows XP and compile with gcc code that was written with emacs ? Why is it so hard for you to answer that question and tell us why there are specific portions of code to add support for Windows in code supposed to be free software and *endorsed* by the FSF (by endorsed I mean that YOU provide more than Makefiles with urls) ? You failed to answer these several times already, yet you keep on bragging and bragging. Can you please take your incoherent propaganda elsewhere ? -- Gilles Chehade http://www.evilkittens.org/ http://www.evilkittens.org/blog/gilles/
