On Dec 11, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
Including a program by name in the ports system does suggest using that program. It grants the program a sort of legitimacy, and that is what I am opposed to.
Where is your line in the sand? When does an operating system become free by your interpretation? When non-free ports frameworks are hosted outside the official OpenBSD cvs repository? On a server not owned by the OpenBSD project? What if I want to host it on my own server, but I also happen to be an OpenBSD developer? When does the disassociation satisfy your unpublished requirements?
Your interpretation is vague and self-serving. --- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
