On Dec 7, 2007 7:32 PM, Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 7, 2007 3:57 PM, Ste Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But hey I am not an Openbsd developer and can't comment on the > > security of lighttpd's code, but I think most people would agree it > > would be better to have a maintained piece of BSD software opposed to > > a fairly stagnant bit of GPL. > > Please note that Apache (in base) is not GPL; this is the license: > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/usr.sbin/httpd/LICENSE?r ev=1.5&content-type=text/plain > > Greetings. > > Opps, my bad
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HTTP s... Marc Espie
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HTTP s... Marco Peereboom
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HT... Okan Demirmen
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HTTP server... Jason George
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HTTP s... Daniel Ouellet
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HT... Ste Jones
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in bas... Daniel Ouellet
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in... Matthew Weigel
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in... Ste Jones
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache ... Andrés
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apa... Ste Jones
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HT... Nick Guenther
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in bas... Greg Thomas
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in... Bob Beck
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache ... Christopher Linn
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HTTP s... ropers
- Re: Could Hiawatha replace Apache as in base HTTP s... Gilbert Fernandes