Timo Schoeler wrote:
< theo was particularly rude to me and uses coarse language despite my being a useful member of the community >

timo,

you're definitely not the first nor shall you be the last person that theo calls a bunch of names, whether the names are fitting or not. when you consider that he has run this project for as long as he has, taking the the funding problems into special consideration, you gotta cut him some slack. he has called me a number of names but i don't sweat it because (1) they were sweeping and inaccurate and (2) it's theo, he's got a real short fuse AFAICT.

namecalling occurs on many mailing lists and much goes unnoticed, albeit more subtly delivered than in this case. as childish as you feel the namecalling is, it is even more childish to take names you are called to heart. also consider that it is excessively rare for posters on this list to be actively censored, a true delight IMO, a rarity amongst lists laden with oversensitive and insecure ;) computer folks. whether this is done to accommodate theo or because people here actually believe in some sort of freedom of speech i am not sure, i enjoy it regardless.

most of what theo says is spot-on but when he gets worked up there is bound to be some collateral damage. AFAICT your case is one of these and you shouldn't sweat it if theo calls you a "raging slashdot dumbfuck who never submits diffs", etc, etc. frankly, i would rather have the situation as-is with theo because being a supporter of a group run by someone who walks on eggshells around oversensitive folks in order to get on their good side and receive myriad small donations from them is patently lame IMO. hell, i fully expect that, given the opportunity, theo will call me plenty more names in the time to come but i don't really give a shit =)

cheers,
jake

Reply via email to