-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Thus ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake Sun, 4 Nov 2007 14:22:43 +0100:
> On 04/11/2007, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but Sorry, Could Not Resist: > > > > (...) > > > > If you really believe that your way works better, go ahead and fork. > > Make your TimoBSD, where you are absolutely free to set the tone in > > any way you want. If you really believe that your way works better, > > then prove your point. Put your words into action and see if you > > attract more and better developers and if you can produce better > > code with TimoBSD. OpenBSD is widely considered the most secure OS > > bar none, has only had 2 remote exploits in over 10 years, yadda, > > yadda, yadda. The NetBSD bellends argued similarly to what's in > > your email, and OpenBSD, after starting as a NetBSD fork, is now > > twice as popular as NetBSD, without even ever trying to win any > > kind of popularity contests. ( http://tinyurl.com/28zowl ) I dare > > say, Theo has been proved correct. But again, if you want to > > revisit the old and lame style-vs-substance debate, go right ahead. > > Code is better than emails. Try to make TimoBSD have better code > > than OpenBSD with your style over substance approach. I dare you > > and I double-dare you. See how far you get. > > Second thought, you don't even have to fork. Your TimoBSD already > exists. It's called NetBSD. You developer are _that_ bad in logic? YMMD, thanks. > You can go right ahead and join them. Where's your facts? I pointed out how OpenBSD could receive more donations. > They > rule by committee, You missed the recent developments WRT Wasabi. You obviously miss the point that without NetBSD OpenBSD would just _not exist_. (There's it again, this 'logic' thingie.) > they are known to have been "nice" (i.e. > politically correct but inhumane and bonkers**), and I'm sure with > your masterful efforts you will lead them to world domination. Talk to your psychiatrist, maybe (s)he really can fix your problem, just to paraphrase you. > --ropers > > **For crissakes, they even substituted their really cool logo with a > bland flag, for fear of offending their valued anti-swearing, > evolution-denying "reborn" US-American "Christian" audience. Is that _my_ problem? Best wishes, Timo iD8DBQFHLeFbUY3eBSqOgOMRCqi/AJ9XE44WQLru5oq3OSas0lsmGkPHJwCdESmX 095eKaY0EVYzb64rhVSoRCM= =Sq0s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
