On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:30:24AM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote: > On 10/31/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > They don't need a list. They could already have started coding. Yet > > we see how few people actually do start coding. Instead, they choose > > to write in english... > > How can we get started on the code unless we have some idea of where > to start on the code? Sure we could just code whatever, but why would > we waste time on things that may be useless? > > > > Obviously patches will be subject to peer review. Even if a patch isn't > > > approved, the coder should have learned something new and useful. > > > > Yeah, right. > > I don't understand. Is newbies learning new things a waste to you? Do > you think they won't really learn anything unless the patch is > approved? Or will the patches not be subject to peer review? Or are > you worried at who would pass for peer review getting overwhelmed by a > huge volume of poor quality patches? > > -Nick >
Remember the motto guys: it's ``shut up and hack'', not whine about getting something to do, then whine about how to do it, and hack. If you don't know what to do, read source code, then hack. If you don't know how to read source code, then learn by reading books, then read source code, then hack. If you don't want to read, just shut up. Pierre Riteau -- a modest contributor who like the way it is.
