On 12/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 13:27, Anis Kadri wrote: > On 12/12/06, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 12/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> 1 prism and 1 ral -> bad performance > > >> 2 ral -> no connection > > >> > > >> has anyone an idea whats the problem of this low operation > > >> range ?
> > > I have a Linksys card that uses ral and I can confirm this
> > I have a similar problem in 3.9 with ral cards; very poor range. > > > > Linksys (ath) [ap] -> Level One (ral) = 5-7 meters > > Linksys (ath) [ap] -> Old 1MBit Intel (wi?) = +30 meters > > Level One (ral pci) [ap] -> Level One (ral pccard) = must be within 1-2 > > meters
> > I tried changing the Tx Power, but that didn't have an effect. Because > > I've heard that the ral driver is very good, I was just assuming that my > > Level One cards have crappy transceivers and/or antennas.
> Same problem with minipci ral cards > max distance: 5-8m.
it seems nobody uses minipci ralink cards ... :-(
Sure we do. Pretty cheap too... I stopped using it and eventually gave it away after i saw the performance of wi(4)... never been happier.
