On 12/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 13:27, Anis Kadri wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 12/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > >> 1 prism and 1 ral -> bad performance
> > >> 2 ral -> no connection
> > >>
> > >> has anyone an idea whats the problem of this low operation
> > >> range ?

> > > I have a Linksys card that uses ral and I can confirm this

> > I have a similar problem in 3.9 with ral cards; very poor range.
> >
> > Linksys (ath) [ap] -> Level One (ral) = 5-7 meters
> > Linksys (ath) [ap] -> Old 1MBit Intel (wi?) = +30 meters
> > Level One (ral pci) [ap] ->  Level One (ral pccard) = must be within 1-2
> > meters

> > I tried changing the Tx Power, but that didn't have an effect. Because
> > I've heard that the ral driver is very good, I was just assuming that my
> > Level One cards have crappy transceivers and/or antennas.

> Same problem with minipci ral cards
> max distance: 5-8m.

it seems nobody uses minipci ralink cards ... :-(

Sure we do. Pretty cheap too...

I stopped using it and eventually gave it away after i saw the
performance of wi(4)... never been happier.

Reply via email to