>> On 2006/10/17 02:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> I just like to know (some have already 4.0 stable and propably also a >> >> pgt-Card) if that Bug was already fixed in 4.0-Stable (because I4ve >> > >> >learn your way around the tree and save yourself some time... >> >http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/ic/pgt.c >> >> Your comment is pointless. >> I don4t see a fix for 4.0 STABLE but for current. > > Look, you are being an asshole. > > We only put into stable *WHAT WE CHOOSE TO PUT THERE* > > This will not go there. Period. > > And you KNOW that. Yet you keep coming here like a little child > who never learns.
Theo... Some peoples will propably OWN such cards and you can`t know if a card needs softmac or hardmac by starring at the CARD itself (at least I can4t..). So propably a lot peoples will SIMPLY try out the card and see "aha they don`t work (yet)". And propably a lot peoples will get a neat crash if they do try to remove the card. So YES it`s your decission but fixing a kernel-crash so that propably not all data is lost because of a crash could maybe soemthign wrong. Other peoples may would call this a DoS... The decission is yours, I`ll provide a Bug-Report anyway if it still happens for 4.0. I4ve also 3 other little Bugs in the Backhand wich I`ll report then (even it`s pure pain to write all the ddb-Output by hand into a textfile because of no serial console). Kind regards, Sebastian p.s. Am I wrong or is the CVS missing the latest OpenSSH-Fixes for 4.0? http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/?only_with_tag=OPENBSD_4_0 Patches provided by the errata tell me some files should have this date: --- usr.bin/ssh/auth.h 6 Jun 2005 11:20:36 -0000 1.51 +++ usr.bin/ssh/auth.h 10 Oct 2006 00:44:23 -0000 But I4m sure this will get fixed if 4.0 gets released. Just for Theo: But you4re right.. put in 4.0-Tree what you think is right....
