On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:00:45 +0200, Theo de Raadt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is, libc bumps happen when functions change in interesting ways.
Just out of curiosity: This is not an update to keep the libc version
number in-sync with the OpenBSD release? It would have remained on 39 if
there would not have been a change in the interface or semantics?
Of course we only change the numbers for good reasons. Keeping it in
sync because it is pretty? Don't be crazy.
Thanks Theo. And a huge apology to Chris for quoting your private mail. I
had not noticed that this one went just to me.
Bernd
