On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:03:55 +0200, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 10/15/06, Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:56:07 +0200, Joachim Schipper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is, libc bumps happen when functions change in interesting ways.
Just out of curiosity: This is not an update to keep the libc version
number in-sync with the OpenBSD release? It would have remained on 39 if
there would not have been a change in the interface or semantics?
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/shlib_version
Thank you for the link, though it does not answer my question.
So I assume the answer to my question is: no, there would not be a bump in
libc version number just to keep it in sync with the OpenBSD version
number.
Sorry for the noise,
Bernd
