> Intel may just be worried that there _might_ be a problem they don't > know about and are trying to protect themselves.
"may just be"? > I imagine that there > are plenty of opportunities for someone to either willfully or > accidentally introduce patented technologies, for which Intel does not > hold a license, into their commercial products. "imagine" > Rather than releasing > information and potentially having to deal with an intellectual property > issue, Intel just doesn't release the information. No facts? None at all? Just "theories" as to why they "might have to not give things away"? All phrased to let them get away with it? That's a lot of apologies you are making for a vendor who sells you broken hardware.
