Steve Tornio wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Rickard Borgmdster wrote:
> 
>>
>> What I see as the problem here, is that the "blacklisting" occurs before
>> the whitelisting. So that, when a large block such as 31.32.33.0/24 is
>> in <spamd> and I wish to whitelist 31.32.33.188, that whitelist entry
>> will have no effect.
> 
> This is solved in spamd, not pf.  Have a look at spamd.conf (5)  In
> short, you specify whitelists to be applied in conjunction with certain
> blacklists.

So that if 31.32.33.0/24 is blacklisted, and I put a whitelist entry of
31.32.33.188 in whitelist.txt, will spamd "break" the /24 into segements
which are individually blocked like this?

31.32.33.0/25
31.32.33.128/27
31.32.33.160/28
31.32.33.176/29 (176-183)
31.32.33.176/30 (184-187)
31.32.33.176.189
31.32.33.176
31.32.33.176.190
31.32.33.176.191
31.32.33.192/26

If that is the case, it's terrific :-) But it still doesn't take care of
the "fastlane", so that whitelisted host doesn't have to go trough the
greylist process. Or does it?

Best regards
Rickard Borgmdster

Reply via email to