Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam wrote: > > Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> He said "good and secure". Phpbb is neither. > >>> > >> Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative > >> > > Nope. > > > Then you are a useless troll.
Or maybe I just don't happen to have an opinion on what is a good forum, I just know that phpBB is a giant pile of crap. > This will be my last reply to your filth. Yet another setback in my lifelong dream to get stupid emails from idiots who love to be offended by everything. I am going to cry. > You did exactly that by attacking Jack's reply and not offering a > superior alternative. I attacked nothing. I stated two simple facts. > Eleven patches in 26 months, or 0.4 patches/month. How does that > compare to your typical Linux distro, or the typical corporate > environment? A forum is a very simple problem to solve. If a forum has had 11 vulnerabilities EVER, then it is crap. This isn't an OS, or some large complex software. Its very simple and straightforward. And 11 patches doesn't mean 11 exploits, often multiple exploits are released by the same person at the same time and fixed in one patch. And all this is with their new security focused development. > How many patches has MSFT released in that timespan? I'm not aware of any patches for MSBB. Oh wait, MS has no forum software. Even you must realize comparing windows to a PHP script is moronic. Adam
