On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:08:48PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > It is personal use, because it is not corporate...
If you want to put it on the OpenBSD artwork webpage, you can download it here: http://ronja.twibright.com/grx/tools/openbsd.png I think it looks much better than the improperly sampled (see Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem) and alpha-crippled GIF images. I just wonder if I start bragging on Ronja mailing list how the audio in OpenBSD kernel regularly deadlocks for me and how I can freeze the machine as ordinary user by running non-suid-exec wine, if this stops being "represent OpenBSD in a positive light" (http://openbsd.org/art1.html) and I'll go to a court ;-) It reminds me the EULA terms of some proprietary software "you can use this program only as long as you are not going to publish any benchmarks about it" ;-) I would personally see terms "you can use the logo to represent your usage of OpenBSD or compatibility with OpenBSD" more appropriate for a free software project logo than the band-aid-over-mouth "represent OpenBSD in a positive light". CL< > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:25:29AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: [...] > > > > I already asked Theo about this in a reply to his reply, but he didn't > > > > reply :( > > > > > > Sure, you can convert them for your personal use. > > > > But I want to display it on a website to illustrate the fact that at least > > one > > project developer (the main one) is using OpenBSD on the development > > machine. > > Does this classify as a personal use when it's for a public display? > > > > CL<
