:( I wanted to also give OpenBSD a little free marketing (the monthly traffic of the Ronja website http://ronja.twibright.com is IIRC around 10GB) by proudly stating we use it on the project (well, me on my devel machine), but it looks like every time I discuss OpenBSD on the Ronja mailing list I would have to take care whether I already put OpenBSD into negative light or not yet, and possibly remove the logo.
Which is a bit impractical to keep on my mind for indefinite future so I am better removing the picture now and leaving just a textual link. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/creat/ronja/trunk/grx/tools$ svn rm openbsd.png D openbsd.png At least I don't have to have a special paragraph dedicated to OpenBSD logo on the Ronja copyright page :) CL< On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:27:26AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Yes, it means that if you are an asshole towards OpenBSD we > withdraw your right to use *OUR* artwork. > > That is EXACTLY what it means. > > That's how every COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK holder in the world > does this, and how we will. > > We have to. There are laws which demand that we protect our > "image", because if we don't protect it, noone will help us > protect it. > > Now please, I have way more important things to do. > > > Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Delivery-Date: Wed Aug 30 11:25:22 2006 > > Received: from twin.jikos.cz (twin.jikos.cz [213.151.79.26]) > > by cvs.openbsd.org (8.13.6/8.12.1) with ESMTP id k7UHPKtM012419 > > (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:25:21 -0600 (MDT) > > Received: from kestrel.twibright.com (zux221-122-143.adsl.green.ch > > [81.221.122.143]) > > (authenticated bits=0) > > by twin.jikos.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7UHPDah011103 > > (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); > > Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:25:14 +0200 > > Received: from clock by kestrel.twibright.com with local (Exim 4.60) > > (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > id 1GIToP-0006Ko-FE; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:25:13 +0200 > > Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:25:13 +0200 > > From: Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: Twibright Ronja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: OpenBSD artwork website wording > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Mime-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Disposition: inline > > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > X-Orientation: Gay > > X-Stance: Goofy > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:42:04AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > I would personally see terms "you can use the logo to represent your > > > > usage of > > > > OpenBSD or compatibility with OpenBSD" more appropriate for a free > > > > software > > > > project logo than the band-aid-over-mouth "represent OpenBSD in a > > > > positive > > > > light". > > > > > > except those are not the types of terms that we can reasonably do, and > > > still be protecting our rights. > > > > > > i've researched what we can do. i've researched the downsides. please > > > don't lecture me... i'm trying to do the best for everyone. > > > > But does it then mean that I cannot criticize OpenBSD in connection with > > Ronja? > > > > CL<
