On 8/27/06, Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just know I'm going to regret asking this, but . . . why does OpenBSD have ksh as the default shell, rather than bash?
ksh is free while bash is GNU licensed. If it is possible to use free (bsd, public domain, etc) software it is preferable. ksh does most everything bash does too, so it doesn't seem like a loss. Good day, Sam
