On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:39:48 +0200, "Peter Philipp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:15:06PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
> > > This is just the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. You are creating
> > > a whole bunch of unneccessary problems for yourself.
> >
> > It's pretty obvious he's trying to hide his true identity because of these
> > mp3
> > activities on the Internet. If he's that paranoid about his probably
> > illegal
> > activities I don't understand why he talks about them in detail on a public
> > mailing list... :-)
>
> Illegal activities? Naw man! I just like moving like a Mack truck.
> See,
> I'm already gone! Once I was upset that they didn't give everyone static
> IP's, and then I thought about the words Vint Cerf said, and I got
> enlightened. Anonymity rocks when you're taking charge of it. If you
> linger around for 20 hours a day someone can track you and the dynamic IP
> is useless. So I'm turning it around, into the intended direction. And
> I
> know I'm on the right path.
>
> There is a lot of things you see when you push the technology to the
> limits,
> like why does pppoe(4) take 6 seconds to authenticate you over Ethernet
> when
> you cycle the pppoeX interface? Obviously streamlining can be done to
> push
> this down below a second. Somewhere there is a loop too many in the sppp
> or
> pppoe code or a timeout too long.
>
> Anyhow per day I see around 1440 IP's, I know my connecting netblock.. do
> you
> know yours?
>
> $ grep "new ip for now" /var/log/all | awk '{print $NF}' | sort -u | wc
> -l
> 17991
> $
>
> There's your odds if you want to find me at any minute. And if you scan
> how do you know that I won't disconnect before the scan reaches me and
> re-
> appear to an IP that the scan already passed? Linear portscanning won't
> work. You may as well send a random packet and hope it comes across my
> ways.
>
>
> > cheers,
> > Tobias
>
> So you can't help me with a useful answer either? Sad.
There are no useful answers for idiots.
Remember this is the same idiot who started the USB keyboard
encryption BS thread. His tinfoil cap is on too tight.
--
Eric Furman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
