On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 12:46 AM Dan <d...@nnnne-o-o-o.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Apparently, you mean:
> >   https://github.com/par7133/pdftexter/blob/main/pdftexter
>
> Yes it is that one, and be sure I am not going to hide it or delete
> in a while.
>
> I want to thank you for all the time spent in writing to me, hopefully
> time spent well for yourself, auditing my script. And.. don't worry I
> will check all your points trying to improve my software effort, I
> remain optimist.
>
> About the licensing matter that is point most interesting among all what
> what you wrote, I have to be sincere with you, seen your
> behaviour in the present, past and most probably in the near future
> (also against other software efforts of mine like RADXIDE) I am
> not worry much to be part of your ports any more, remain assured
> of it. Certainly, having your consideration against my effort could be
> a nice honorificence but, frankly, you can continue to takle your own
> reputation that is a no-wish actually for my own collaborative doing.

I have absolutely no idea how to parse the last paragraph, but I
wanted to chime in on the side of Ingo — take his advice because it's
spot on.

My only two cents would be that checking if a program is installed at
runtime could make sense in a single-script type of tool because there
is a larger risk of someone (future you perhaps) copying the script
over to a different machine, forgetting about the prerequisites, and
then be disappointed after waiting 5 minutes for the tool to do
something and then spit out "oops, couldn't find tool XYZ". Easier to
check first (but check correctly...)

Reply via email to