On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:08 AM Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:14 AM Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
>> I think you've managed to hit a spot where the POSIX standard doesn't 
>> provide a way for a program to find the information it needs to do its job 
>> correctly.  I've filed a ticket there
>>    https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1831
>>
>> We'll see if my understanding of pathconf() is incorrect or if someone has a 
>> great idea for how to get around this...
>
> So yeah, what's needed is pathconfat(2)** but whether this winding loose end 
> ("That poor yak.") merits that much code and surface is yet to be examined 
> deeply.

The fix for this has now been committed, so it'll be in 7.6 and a near
future snapshot.


Philip Guenther

Reply via email to