Guys,
Thanks for the quick response and advice...always helpful as usual

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 8:07 AM Stuart Henderson <stu.li...@spacehopper.org>
wrote:

> On 2022-01-11, Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net> wrote:
> > Atticus [grobe...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> It isn't just SIP. You will need to set up NAT traversal and make sure
> RTP
> >> traffic can pass as well. Setting up a STUN server and configuring the
> >> clients to use it should aid in the NAT portion. The RTP traffic should
> be
>
> Sometime STUN can be used to optimise things (getting call media direct
> between endpoints rather than going via a PBX) but it adds complication
> and is hardly ever _needed_.
>
> >> fine as long as pf is being stateful. If the phones register over SIP
> fine,
> >> but have no audio, then the RTP traffic isn't getting where it should.
> IMO,
> >> it makes more sense to use an on-site PBX so you only have to deal with
> >> traffic to/from the one host, but that doesn't sound like an option for
> you.
> >>
> >
> > Using Asterisk as a SIP server and media gateway, on a public IP with
> phones
> > behind NAT, you can get NAT traversal via RFC 3581+symmetric RTP
> (sip.conf
> > nat=yes) without STUN and without a firewall SIP ALG.
> >
> > Freeswitch and also Kamailio + rtpproxy can do similar. These gateways
> are
> > all capable of symmetric RTP, and have been since forever.
> >
> > If you are connecting phones inside of your NAT to an outside SIP
> provider,
> > or PBX device, make sure the PBX has a public IP (not behind another NAT
> > itself) and has symmetric RTP enabled.
>
> Most end-user-facing SIP providers (rather than wholesale providers)
> seem pretty capable of handling client devices or PBXs behind NAT.
>
> Generally getting this to work natively requires that whoever is
> configuring
> it understands how the protocols work, and software that allows things like
> sending RTP back to the IP that a SIP message was received from, and
> sending SIP keepalives back to the source port that it received requests
> from (frequent enough to avoid them timing out). It's not hard, but
> is often not something that techs from a telco will do.
>
> Another way to do things is to use VPNs and bypass firewalls/NAT that
> way.
>
>
>

Reply via email to