[cutting back on tos to just misc@]

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:25:15PM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote:
> 
> have in the back of my mind "consider repairing" ...
> 
> So I just have to ask ... what then would be the supported/approved disk
> layout for OpenBSD 6.8 on my Intel 8i5 NUC with the following storage:
> 
> 1. A 2TB Samsung SSD: Currently identified as:
> sd0 at scsibus1 targ 2 lun 0: <ATA, Samsung SSD 860, RVM0> 
> naa.5002538e4109632a
> sd0: 1953514MB, 512 bytes/sector, 4000797360 sectors, thin
> 
> 2. A 512GB Samsung M.2 NVMe device: Currently identified as:
> sd1 at scsibus2 targ 1 lun 0: <NVMe, Samsung SSD 970, 1B2Q>
> sd1: 476940MB, 512 bytes/sector, 976773168 sectors

That's close enough to my 2017-vintage laptop that has been through countless
sysupggrades, which has:

sd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: <ATA, Samsung SSD 860, RVT0> naa.5002538e4098fefc
sd0: 1907729MB, 512 bytes/sector, 3907029168 sectors, thin
sd1 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: <NVMe, Samsung SSD 960, 1B6Q>
sd1: 488386MB, 512 bytes/sector, 1000215216 sectors

which I, based on the suggestions from the installer back then modified
to:

[Tue Sep 29 14:56:15] peter@greyhame:~$ df -h
Filesystem     Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
/dev/sd1a     1005M    198M    757M    21%    /
/dev/sd0d      1.8T    624G    1.1T    36%    /home
/dev/sd1d     31.5G    9.5M   29.9G     0%    /tmp
/dev/sd1f     98.4G    2.8G   90.7G     3%    /usr
/dev/sd1g      9.8G    268M    9.1G     3%    /usr/X11R6
/dev/sd1h      108G   17.0G   85.8G    17%    /usr/local
/dev/sd1k      9.8G    2.0K    9.3G     0%    /usr/obj
/dev/sd1j     49.2G    1.2G   45.5G     3%    /usr/src
/dev/sd1e     98.4G    183M   93.3G     0%    /var

No problem ever running sysupgrade on that.

(The install notes can still be found at 
https://bsdly.blogspot.com/2017/07/openbsd-and-modern-laptop.html)

> 
> It's my main desktop system, running XFCE.
> 
> Currently df shows:
> Filesystem     Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> /dev/sd1a     1005M    314M    640M    33%    /
> mfs:6361       7.7G    331M    7.0G     4%    /tmp
> /dev/sd1e     58.3G   91.3M   55.3G     0%    /var
> /dev/sd1f      2.0G    1.2G    686M    64%    /usr
> /dev/sd1g     1005M    251M    703M    26%    /usr/X11R6
> /dev/sd1h     19.7G   11.0G    7.7G    59%    /usr/local
> /dev/sd1k      5.9G    2.0K    5.6G     0%    /usr/obj
> /dev/sd1j      2.0G    2.0K    1.9G     0%    /usr/src
> /dev/sd1l      295G   10.0G    271G     4%    /fast
> /dev/sd0h      1.8T    964G    758G    56%    /space

>From this and the earlier discussion I think what confuses sysupgrade is the
lack of /home (did you say you replaced that with a symlink?), which I assume
could be remedied with a bit of renaming of mount points and shuffling things 
around under your new /home. Or starting from scratch, of course.


-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.

Reply via email to