You are acting a fool. If you admit to seeing how they eat their own dog food and the quality of the project because of their own way, but only when it suits your internet arguments, then you may as well just buy security from a big corporate Linux. It's not about $100 words hiding a children's tantrum after being told it's up to you, it's about understanding that *it's up to you*.
On Tue, May 12, 2020, 4:20 PM <i...@aulix.com> wrote: > It is IMHO rather not a matter of trusting your questions, but not my > willingness to answer them right now, but I can answer them later if I > want, it is not a matter of trust but rather a tactics of choosing a > sequence of what to answer and when. > > You know there is no a lot of secure enough alternatives to choose from > except OpenBSD, and your commits alone shall not be of that a big problem > and reason to reject OpenBSD since the code is being reviewed by other > OpenBSD participants? > > Do you think there are less committers like you in many many Linux > components like Linux kernel, AppArmor, a Linux distro and is there any > other choice for me except OpenBSD and some type of a hardened Linux > without systemd like Devuan or Alpine? > > Is not it a childish behavior of yours that is if I do not follow your > method of discussion then I shall not use your work, you ban me from > allowed users at least mentally by your ultimatum not practically of course > as you cannot prohibit me to use any open source products like OpenBSD or > Linux distros. > >
