> seem to even know that stable exists. My original thought was that there
were mal \
> intent. I think not now, unless it has been shaped by criticism. It is a
highly \
no i think your first thought was right. there's clearly malice he just
lacks
the maturity to be forthright and honest about it and instead chose to be
passive-aggressive with his deceptive and snide remarks, childish tshirt
and
denigrating presentation. this entire pretense from the moment he got
butthurt
over someone on irc for favoring OpenBSD to his URL and website has been
derogatory
> as possible. He could lose a bit of arrogance and is wrong in a few
places. I don't \
> actually even agree with his security quotes entirely as with everything
it depends \
> on context like mitigations cannot be taken alone, without the context
of other \
> mitigations, older hardware etc..
you're right about this. he misses the forest for the trees by almost
entirely
disregarding the context of OpenBSD as an operating system
> Perhaps I missed the point but attacks not being currently used is a
false metric as \
> they could still be used, if allowed. I think he has done quite well
considering and \
that part was really stupid. he must also think that because python2 has
reached
its EOL you no longer have to worry about bugs that affect 2.x codebases
jajaja
> clearly has some knowledge around attack vectors. His biggest mistake is
he should be \
> asking questions considering his limited knowledge of OpenBSD and not
making arrogant \
> statements. It was an interesting talk atleast and re-evaluation is
almost always \
if he was coming from a place of sincerity than you'd expect him to have at
least reached out on the mailing list but its clear his intentions were
entirely
motivated by malice from the start
> issue. If so, then that is a naive view. More likely, he is just in
transition to \
OpenBSD :-)
i wouldn't be surprised to know he is a kali user
At moment, I want my privacy to be protected.
https://mytemp.email/
