Case in point: commit messages. as claudio proved, he posited inaccurate
and
blatantly false assertions that any objective researcher would immediately
realize is obviously wrong but because he's seeking data that confirms his
preconceived notion that "HUR DUR OPENBSD BAD!" he completely misses the
mark.
rather than think "hmm 75% of commits are only 20 chars or less which seems
unusual let's take a closer look" he shouts "HAH I KNEW IT! OPENBSD d3vZ
sUx0r!"
classic confirmation bias. my pops, god bless his soul, used to say the way
you
do one thing is the way you do everything. and the way this kid shows his
true
colors with this example is the way he approached this whole eisegetic
charade:
subjectively. and with the burning desire to make you see OpenBSD the way
he
_feels_ about OpenBSD. not how it is. not what it does or doesn't do. not
the
uniformly positive experience by its userbase. just how those notoriously
mean
badguys made him feel that time he kept submitting ports that were rejected
for
not being up to standard. he made numerous spurious remarks with no
evidence to
support their veracity. and childish criticisms of development practices
simply
because he doesn't like it not for any objectively quantifiable metrics of
quality or productivity or security. it really vexes him that OpenBSD
doesn't
use github and patchwork doesn't it. the only real interest i have in the
talk
is what exactly was it that hurt him so much that he harbors all this
resentment
and bitterness. its obvious he's upset because if he had any genuine desire
to
empower and help people like he said he would make efforts to improve
something
he saw he could improve rather than spread FUD
At moment, I want my privacy to be protected.
https://mytemp.email/
