On 2/7/06, Joe S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I couldn't find anything in the misc archives, but perhaps I didn't > really look that hard. But the biggest issue is the Apache 2.0 license. > I'm not sure what the problem is with the license, but I believe it may > be that Apache 2 license is more restrictive. In what way? I don't know.
wc L*
58 408 2827 LICENSE-1.1
202 1581 11358 LICENSE-2.0.txt
