On 2/8/06, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/8/06, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that > > on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an > > additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later, > > httpd 1.3 *will be deprecated* in favor of newer versions (2.0, 2.2), > > and now certainly with 2.2 released. > > > > Are there any plans about when 2.2 (or 2.0) will be included in the base > > fileset? Or remove apache out of the fileset and let the users install > > it themselfs with a port? > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=110242455717049&w=2 > > The Apache Software people refused to incorporates a lot of security > features >
I mean security patches from the OpenBSD project. >because it would make their Apache release incompatible with > the Netware Operating System. > > So the Apache shipped with OpenBSD is not really the same as the one > released by the Apache Project with the same version number. > > a lot while ago Henning had said that there was about 4000 lines of > Code difference between the OpenBSD Apache and the one from Apache > Project and Also that Apache2 is a Design Fault. > > Just some Info :-) > > Kind Regards > -- > Siju Oommen George, Network Consultant. HiFX IT & MEDIA SERVICES PVT. > LTD. http://www.hifx.net > -- Siju Oommen George, Network Consultant. HiFX IT & MEDIA SERVICES PVT. LTD. http://www.hifx.net
