Hi Justina, justina colmena wrote on Thu, May 24, 2018 at 05:54:45PM +0000:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 11:47:47 +0200 > Marko Cupać <marko.cu...@mimar.rs> wrote: >> I am sure OpenBSD will correct their errors in html/css code, if any, > Right now, https://man.openbsd.org/relayd.conf.5 fails html validation. > https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fman.openbsd.org%2Frelayd.conf.5 > There are several html <code> elements with duplicate IDs. Sure, that's on the TODO list: http://mandoc.bsd.lv/cgi-bin/cvsweb/TODO?rev=HEAD --- HTML issues -------------------------------------------------------- - duplicate names generate duplicate href="#..." anchor attributes possibly use "#..._<N>" suffixes? Jakub Klinkovsky <j dot l dot k at gmx dot com> 3 Oct 2017 21:23:36 +0200 see also the thread: gre(4): Rename duplicate sections up to 20 Apr 2018 15:27:33 +0200 loc * exist * algo * size * imp *** It's not the worst HTML syntax violation left in mandoc, and it's among the easier ones to fix. Actually, just skipping dupes may be better than suffixes because permalinks with suffixes don't make much sense. As soon as someone inserts or deletes text, subsequent permalink anchors with suffixes might suddenly point to different places, ehich defeats the very purpose of permalinks. Besides, the main virtue of mandoc permalinks is their simplicity, allowing people to type them by hand without even looking at the manual page first. I just know that https://man.openbsd.org/cat#v will work (and is harmful), without even testing it first. Appending suffixes would compromise that virtue. Yours, Ingo
