On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Aham Brahmasmi <aham.brahma...@gmx.com> wrote: >> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 10:18 AM >> From: "Ayaka Koshibe" <akosh...@gmail.com> >> To: misc@openbsd.org >> Subject: Re: Cannot access internet with virtual switch >> >> > This informs us that for a PACKET_OUT with action OUTPUT, it cannot >> > have its port as ANY. Now, I do not know why for a PACKET_OUT message, >> > an action OUTPUT cannot have port as ANY. More importantly, I do not >> > know why the controller seems to be sending the PACKET_OUT with action >> > OUTPUT and port ANY. >> >> A PACKET_OUT is usually a response to some message e.g. a PACKET_IN, >> so it would probably help to see which message (if any) the switch >> sent to the controller to receive that PACKET_OUT. > > Thank you Koshibe-san for your reply. > > From what I understand, the PACKET_IN for that PACKET_OUT seems to be > the following: > > ofrelay_input_done: connection 1.1: 179 bytes from switch 1 > /dev/switch0 > any: version 1_3 type PACKET_IN length 179 xid 81972 > buffer NO_BUFFER length 129 reason REASON_NO_MATCH table <0> cookie > 0x0000000000000000 > match type OXM length 24 (padded to 26) > ox match class OPENFLOW_BASIC type IN_PORT hasmask no length 4 > 1 > ox match class OPENFLOW_BASIC type META hasmask no length 8 > 0 > switch_learn: updated mac ac:1f:6b:2e:22:ce on switch 1 port 1 > packet_input: ac:1f:6b:2e:22:ce -> 00:c8:8b:e2:d6:87, port 1 -> 1
This seems to be the right message. It looks like switchd will set the output port to ANY if it sees a loop (which port 1 -> 1 suggests), intended for dropping the packet. Do you have loops? > I have also attached the complete output of "doas switchd -dvvvv". This > is because I do not know whether the above message is the correct > PACKET_OUT message corresponding to the PACKET_IN message. > > Regards, > ab > ---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|--
