This? http://www.businessinsider.com/people-are-mad-at-linus-torvalds-again-2015-1 (for the "linus" paragraph) or, for that matter, this? https://packages.debian.org/jessie/coreutils (for the "dir" paragraph)
Slightly on topic (and attempting to redeem myself for responding to this particular troll), I will note that http://man.openbsd.org/fstab.5 has several paragraphs that touch on the issue raised in this thread, one of which is this: "The fourth field, fs_mntops, describes the mount options associated with the filesystem. It is formatted as a comma separated list of options. It contains at least the type of mount (see fs_type below) plus any additional options appropriate to the filesystem type." Thanks, -- Raul On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Dag Richards <dagricha...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > On 9/10/16 12:54 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 06:52:39PM +0300, Consus wrote: >>> >>> On 03:09 Mon 05 Sep, Theo de Raadt wrote: >>>> >>>>> OpenBSD 6.0 GENERIC.MP#0 amd64 >>>>>> >>>>>> My fstab entry looks like : >>>>>> >>>>>> 10.10.10.10:/srv/share /mnt/ops_test nfs >>>>>> defaults,noexec,nosuid,nodev,auto 0 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> However: >>>>>> >>>>>> $ doas mount /mnt/ops_test >>>>>> doas (m...@example.com) password: >>>>>> mount: can't find fstab entry for /mnt/ops_test >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any ideas ? That style of fstab entry seems to work fine on my linux >>>>>> boxes (albeit with nfs4 instead of nfs, but that makes no difference >>>>>> on openbsd). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, openbsd is not linux. >>>>> >>>>> Have no idea what that word "defaults" in there means. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I guess it would've been better to say something like: >>>> >>>> mount: unknown option "defaults" for /mnt/ops_test >>>> >>>> Care for a patch? >>>> >>> >>> The option parsing code already gives you en error message if it sees >>> an unknown option. >>> >> >> Such as: >> >> mount_ffs: -o default: option not supported >> >> Summary: The OP has a learning disability. He should probably stay in >> Linux land, where the field is large, and his inability can remain >> hidden. See, once again I am not insulting Linux. >> >> > > "See, once again I am not insulting Linux." > > Hopefully you have derived at some modicum of amusement from this exchange. > > It's had me chuckling all afternoon. > > More proof that OBSD deserves it's reputation for harshness. > > Whereas with Linux ... Well Linus is known as a humble compassionate > person, who's patience kindness is admired by all. It's always heart > warming how Linus monitors the maligning lists and chimes in with helpful > hints and words of encouragement. > > > when I type dir in the command thingy it never tells me this files is sees. > > > > -- > > IS-IS sleeps. > BGP peers are quiet. > Something must be wrong.
