> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 06:52:39PM +0300, Consus wrote:
>
> > On 03:09 Mon 05 Sep, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > OpenBSD 6.0 GENERIC.MP#0 amd64
> > > >
> > > > My fstab entry looks like :
> > > >
> > > > 10.10.10.10:/srv/share /mnt/ops_test nfs
> > > > defaults,noexec,nosuid,nodev,auto 0 0
> > > >
> > > > However:
> > > >
> > > > $ doas mount /mnt/ops_test
> > > > doas (m...@example.com) password:
> > > > mount: can't find fstab entry for /mnt/ops_test
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas ? That style of fstab entry seems to work fine on my linux
> > > > boxes (albeit with nfs4 instead of nfs, but that makes no difference
> > > > on openbsd).
> > >
> > > Well, openbsd is not linux.
> > >
> > > Have no idea what that word "defaults" in there means.
> >
> > I guess it would've been better to say something like:
> >
> > mount: unknown option "defaults" for /mnt/ops_test
> >
> > Care for a patch?
>
> The option parsing code already gives you en error message if it sees
> an unknown option.
Such as:
mount_ffs: -o default: option not supported
Summary: The OP has a learning disability. He should probably stay in
Linux land, where the field is large, and his inability can remain
hidden. See, once again I am not insulting Linux.
