Sun, 22 May 2016 19:21:13 +1000 <bytevolc...@safe-mail.net> > > Using XHTML 1.0 Strict wouldn't be a bad idea, since this is supported
This is not so convincing proof, nor reasoning. Any document type is just as good as the other when the internals match the definition, as long as the type is the intended one, and has majority of web browsers supporting it as common denominator. Lots of noise and little signal. > on all modern browsers, and even Dillo and Lynx support it. At the > moment the page triggers the browsers' "quirks" modes. > Just some food for thought.
