I tried both the current site (http://www.openbsd.org) and the proposed
new site (http://greatest-ape.github.io/openbsd-site/openbsd/index.html)
using a variety of OpenBSD 5.8-stable web browsers, displaying on a
monitor with 96x97 pixels/inch.  Sometimes one wants to have GUI web
browsers share screen space with other stuff, so I tried both "wide"
windows (> 1000 pixels width on my monitor) and narrower ones (down to
600 pixels or so).

Below I give a table with details of what I found.  To summarize:
* Both sites look ok with lynx running in an xterm.  This held true
  for a variety of xterm widths.
* For windows >= about 850 pixels wide, the current site looks great 
  on every GUI browser I tried.  For narrower windows the main text
  didn't flow, but rather required horizontal scrolling to read each
  line.
* The new site looks pale and washed-out in every GUI browser I tried,
  as if the monitor isn't delivering proper color saturation.
* The new site doesn't handle narrow windows well -- below about 800
  pixels width the main text is moved down to below the left menubar,
  resulting (for typical window heights) in the main text being invisible
  unless/until the user scrolls down.
* The new site renders particularly poorly in netsurf and dillo, with
  the logo misplaced (netsurf) or missing altogether (dillo), and wide
  windows having the same graphical problems as narrow windows.

Overall I strongly prefer the current site.



Details:

               existing site              proposed new site
               -----------------          -------------------------
window width   wide       narrow          wide               narrow

firefox        great      mediocre (2)    mediocre (3)       poor (3,4)
arora          great      mediocre (2)    medoocre (3)       poor (3,4)
midori         great      mediocre (2)    mediocre (3)       poor (3,4)
xombrero       great      mediocre (2)    mediocre (3)       poor (3,4)
netsurf        great      mediocre (2)    poor (3,5)         poor (3,4)
dillo          great      mediocre (2)    poor (3,6)         poor (3,6)
lynx           ok                  ok     ok                 ok

Notes:
(1) "Wide" windows are about 1000 pixels wide.
(2) For windows less than around 850 pixels wide, text is chopped off
    at the beginning/end of each line, and a horizontal scroll bar or
    left/right arrow keys must be used to go back and forth to read
    each line of text.
(3) The new site looks pale and washed-out (as if the monitor isn't
    delivering proper color saturation), but it's readable.
(4) For windows less than about 800 to 810 pixels wide, the main text is
    moved down to below the left sidebar, so it's not visible at all without
    scrolling down.
(5) Logo is misplaced, left menubar is moved down to below the logo, and
    all the main text after the first sentence is moved down to below the
    menubar.
(6) There's no logo (only the text description of it, despite this being
    a GUI X-windows browser).  All the main text after the first sentence
    is moved down to below the menubar.

-- 
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]" 
<jth...@astro.indiana-zebra.edu>
   Dept of Astronomy & IUCSS, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
   "There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched
    at any given moment.  How often, or on what system, the Thought Police
    plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork.  It was even conceivable
    that they watched everybody all the time."  -- George Orwell, "1984"

Reply via email to