> I've been reading about IPv6 and the KAME project. 
> 
> I read that OpenBSD integrated just IPv6 code rather than both (having
> developed their own IPSec stack).
> 
> The information that I'm reading is from 2004. Does anyone who if this
> is still true?

KAME had a v6 stack that included ipsec.  On the other hand, some of
their routing logic was highly immature and incomplete, and would have
mirrored code that was already in the BSD kernel.

In OpenBSD land, an IPSEC stack was already far in development, by angelos;
it was a packet defer architecture that could work with hardware crypto
engines, and used the standard routing table for policy decision logic.

There is a third part to the story.  Craig Metz bad adapted the routing
logic in the kernel to make it v6 ready.  itojun recognized merging of
these codebases as a good direction forward. 

So itojun, cmetz and angelos came up with a plan to merge the right
parts together and started it, then a bit later over a week the job
was completed at the first openbsd hackathon in my house, Jun 4 - 6,
1999.  (Oddly, I now believe it was longer than 3 days, but it is hard
to remember 17 years back).

We believe that day was the first time ipv6 worked in a full official
operating system, and same with ipsec, and same with ipsec over ipv6
(i recall that being a lot more flaky, but it was early days).  Other
ipv6 work by other teams had just been "testbeds", not fully targetted
towards complete integration and shipping.

Off in FreeBSD land, a bit later, they were connected to different
members of the KAME team, and instead opted to integrate KAME v6 +
ipsec as-is.  About 10 years later, they saw the light and integrated
angelos's ipsec stack as well as an option, probably because it the
crypto offload / cpu crypto instruction awareness (which is largely
due the ability of the forwarding path to defer packet crypto job in a
staged forwarding path, which I convinced angelos to build in support
of how hardware engines would work).  A few years ago they finished
that switchover.

that help?

Reply via email to