On 11 December 2015 at 14:16, Tati Chevron <chev...@swabsit.com> wrote:
> But even if PKI were actively on fire at the moment (which it is not), >> what's wrong with doing both? >> > > Basically the gain verses the effort and resources expended. > > I agree that there is a value in distributing keys and source code in a way > that makes tampering difficult or highly visible. > > I disagree that serving www.openbsd.org over https is a good way of doing > that. Fair enough. Though I personally still think it'd be a good idea, I am just a stranger on the internet and this is not a vote. -Thijs
