On 11 December 2015 at 12:28, Stefan Sperling <s...@stsp.name> wrote:

> I would consider signify keys printed on CDs and copied across several
> web sites safer than trusting the hundreds of CA certs shipped with a
> standard web browser.


On 11 December 2015 at 12:35, Tati Chevron <chev...@swabsit.com> wrote:

> The official CD set contains the signify keys for that release and the
> next one.  Once you have a known good copy of one set, you can always
> obtain
> future ones securely.


Both of you are missing my point, but it's entirely possible I didn't
articulate it properly.

I know I can trust the CD's; it's one of the main reasons I buy them with
every release.
I'm saying I shouldn't *have* to rely on snail-mailed physical media. We,
as a species, have thought of a solution to this problem long ago.

Sure that solution isn't perfect, but if I can guess at the list's
attitude, I'd say it's this:

>  "If we can't make it impossible to intercept traffic, we shouldn't
bother with making it merely fiendishly difficult."

which I think is unnecessarily fatalistic.


In either case, I'd be willing to put my money where my mouth is.
Whom do I contact about running a site mirror?

-Thijs

Reply via email to