On 2/26/15, Ulf Brosziewski <ulf.brosziew...@t-online.de> wrote: > On 02/26/2015 06:06 PM, patrick keshishian wrote: >> On 2/26/15, Ulf Brosziewski<ulf.brosziew...@t-online.de> wrote: >>> On 02/26/2015 02:32 AM, patrick keshishian wrote: >>>> On 2/25/15, Ulf Brosziewski<ulf.brosziew...@t-online.de> wrote: > ... >>> >>> Hi Patrick, >>> >>> thanks for the reply. What I meant was this: There can be a (possibly >>> small) time interval between the contacts, or this interval can be >>> (nearly) zero. In the first case, the "finger count" of the driver >>> should change from 0 to 1, then from 1 to 2. If the hardware is not >>> extremely accurate it may change directly from 0 to 2 in the second >>> case. If the hardware *is* very accurate, it may be difficult to produce >>> these "double contacts". The test I had in mind could look like this: >>> You >>> move the cursor over a scrollable document, lift the moving finger, then >>> make a "double contact" on a position that has a noticeable (vertical) >>> distance from the previous contact point. If the document moves/"jumps" >>> when the double contact is made, there's something wrong. This can >>> happen when the driver doesn't "count" properly. >> >> Hello and thanks for the clarification of your test-case. >> I have been attempting it this morning, but not able to >> see any jumps. It seems/feels pretty "solid". >> >> Sorry, >> --patrick >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Ulf >> > > Hi Patrick, may I ask you a last question? Does tapping work with the > reverted version?
Hi Ulf, Yes. Tapping works. Double tap to select words, tap + tap- hold-and-drag to select sequence of characters or drag/move windows, etc. Two finger tap to bring up contextual menus .. I've really not had any issues with my touchpad. In fact, I was pleasantly surprised when it just worked out-of-the-box, so to speak. HTH, --patrick
