>On Wed, Jan 1, 2014, at 06:17 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> I think dmassage being unmaintained for 12 years, and this issue just >> coming up now, probably says a lot about that "type" of person. It's >> a type of person who can't fix dmassage, and then, sends us a mail. >> Sorry, but it's the truth. > >Very little, if anything, has changed in either the kernel configuration >procedure or the format of a kernel's dmesg in the last 12 years. So >this is more a case of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."
So glad to have the expert speak.
