>On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 19:28, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > >> If it is not broken don't fix it: fine, but it still can be made >> user-friendly, e.g. by marking certain commented out devices as "to >> review" or by not commenting them out at all if they are known or >> something like that. >> Or perhaps a comment line in the kernel config like "do not disable this >> ever or if you use X", something which config fails to catch, that's >> all. One would think that config should catch dependencies. > >This is an area where patches may be welcome, but bug reports aren't. >If you can't fix it and send a diff, we're not much interested in >tracking down the problem ourselves.
Indeed.. Riccardo, you are not understanding something. dmassage is not openbsd software. It comes from someone else, I am not even going to check where. If anyone is going to fix it, it isn't misc@openbsd.org
