................Tue 30.Jul'13 at 18:46:59 -0400, STeve Andre'................ > On 07/30/13 18:15, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:48:11PM +0400, h...@riseup.net wrote: > >>I realize that everything has its pros and cons (like URXVT is > >>GPL-licensed, st is pretty much hackish for an ordinary user and Clang > >>is not, well, "mature" yet). But ain't pros of the programs above not > >>enough to actually make it in the base? > >>(replacing XTerm and GCC) > >> > >there seem to be many pros, but nobody did the work yet (hint ;) > > > >-- Alexandre > > > > > Hub, > > If the software is GPL'd, it won't go into base, period. > > However, making this stuff available as a port seems a reasonable > thing to do. The more ports the better. I can't speak to things > like urxvt so I don't know how much of a pain they'd be to incorporate > into OpenBSD but making them available is reasonable from a > user point of view. > > --STeve Andre' I use urxvt, but I can't see any reason for it being in the base code. Not everyone likes it or needs it.
The default X apps in xenocara are really all that's needed, unless a user wants to add stuff to use the system as a desktop - which is what the ports/packages are for. -- James Griffin: jmz at kontrol.kode5.net A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
