On 07/30/13 18:15, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:48:11PM +0400, h...@riseup.net wrote:
I realize that everything has its pros and cons (like URXVT is
GPL-licensed, st is pretty much hackish for an ordinary user and Clang
is not, well, "mature" yet). But ain't pros of the programs above not
enough to actually make it in the base?
(replacing XTerm and GCC)
there seem to be many pros, but nobody did the work yet (hint ;)
-- Alexandre
Hub,
If the software is GPL'd, it won't go into base, period.
However, making this stuff available as a port seems a reasonable
thing to do. The more ports the better. I can't speak to things
like urxvt so I don't know how much of a pain they'd be to incorporate
into OpenBSD but making them available is reasonable from a
user point of view.
--STeve Andre'
