On Jul 10 13:06:48, es...@nerim.net wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:06:44AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote:
> > > On Jul 10 01:30:23, guent...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Looks like a race in luit's startup, due to how it handles the
> > >> > ttys/ptys. To work around the problem, invoke it with the -p
> > >> > option...but I don't know how you can convince xterm to do that.
> > >>
> > >> Ha! I believe this bug is a result of posix_openpt() being
> > >> implemented in 5.3
> > >
> > > When was this introduced into the snapshots?
> > > I have been seeing this for some time before 5.3
> >
> > posix_openpt(3):
> > The posix_openpt() function appeared in OpenBSD 5.3.
>
> ... generally this means this happened some time between 5.2 and 5.3,
> so if you were using the snapshots, yeah...
>
> guenther, you could have been more useful :) quoting changelog dates
> for instance:
>
> Changes by: mill...@cvs.openbsd.org 2012/12/03 13:08:33
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah, that would be vaguely when I started to see this. Thanks.
> Modified files:
> include : stdlib.h
> lib/libc/stdlib: Makefile.inc
> lib/libc : shlib_version
> Added files:
> lib/libc/stdlib: posix_openpt.3 ptsname.3 posix_pty.c
>
> Log message:
> Simple emulation of POSIX pty APIs posix_openpt(), ptsname(),
> grantpt() and unlockpt() using /dev/ptm. Man pages from FreeBSD.
> OK kettenis@ deraadt@ beck@ ajacoutot@ naddy@
