On 07/04/13 09:46, Boris Goldberg wrote: > Hello guys, ... > If the softraid is so raw yet, why the old good RAIDFrame was removed > starting the 5.2? It works just fine for me. Big volumes rebuilds take a > long while, but it's something working.
That's quite a leap from "RAID 5 is not ready for use" to "softraid is so raw". RAID5 is one discipline of several that isn't complete. RAID0 is ready for use, RAID1 is ready for use, crypto is ready for use. It is also quite a leap to call old RAIDframe "good". It was horribly old, unmaintained code, which wasn't well loved by developers when it was fresh and current. Your assumptions are wrong. Nick.
