On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:38:48PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/06/14 21:49, John Tate wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>
> > wrote:
> > > On 2013-06-14, John Tate <j...@johntate.org> wrote:
> > >> It doesn't complain about it but I've never done much with routing
> > >> before. If I wanted to do it on the machine I'd do
> > >> # route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.1
> > >
> > > Why would you need to do this at all, it seems you are already using
> > > 192.168.1.1 as your default route?
> > I thought I needed it so 192.168.0/24 can access 192.168.1/24
>
> Try e.g. "route -n get 192.168.1.5" with and without a route to the subnet.
> In one case there will be a default route pointing at 192.168.0.1 and in the
> other case there will be a 192.168.1.0/24 route pointing at 192.168.0.1.
>
>
> > >
> > >> I can't seem to find how to do this in dhcp-options(5)
> > >>
> > >> Named won't even start with this...
> > >> option static-routes 192.168.1/24 192.168.0.1;
> > >> Or this...
> > >> option static-routes 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.1;
> > >
> > > "option static-routes" is for classful (class A/B/C) addresses, you may
> > > not specify a subnet mask there.
> > >
> > >>>> I have the following dhcpd.conf...
> > >>>> shared-network kab {
> > >
> > > Why do you have shared-network?
> > >
> > Can't remember why I did that so I just got rid of it. I added "option
> > routers 192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1;" before the subnets at the top of
> > the file and now I am getting the right default gateway.
>
> Routers should be set in the "subnet" block, you shouldn't hand
> 192.168.1.1 as a possible router to hosts which are in 192.168.0.x.
>
> > I got rid of the static routes, they were not working anyway. I must
> > need to add something to pf to route between subnets 192.168.0/24 and
> > 192.168.1.1/24 and visa-versa.
>
> This is usually easy enough to work out. Add 'log' in relevant places
> in pf.conf and watch tcpdump -neipflog0
>
Also, support for static-routes was just added in the last week or so
and you've not mentioned what versions of OpenBSD/dhcpd/dhclient you
are running.
.... Ken
