On 2013/06/14 21:49, John Tate wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>
> wrote:
> > On 2013-06-14, John Tate <j...@johntate.org> wrote:
> >> It doesn't complain about it but I've never done much with routing
> >> before. If I wanted to do it on the machine I'd do
> >> # route add -net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.1
> >
> > Why would you need to do this at all, it seems you are already using
> > 192.168.1.1 as your default route?
> I thought I needed it so 192.168.0/24 can access 192.168.1/24
Try e.g. "route -n get 192.168.1.5" with and without a route to the subnet.
In one case there will be a default route pointing at 192.168.0.1 and in the
other case there will be a 192.168.1.0/24 route pointing at 192.168.0.1.
> >
> >> I can't seem to find how to do this in dhcp-options(5)
> >>
> >> Named won't even start with this...
> >> option static-routes 192.168.1/24 192.168.0.1;
> >> Or this...
> >> option static-routes 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.1;
> >
> > "option static-routes" is for classful (class A/B/C) addresses, you may
> > not specify a subnet mask there.
> >
> >>>> I have the following dhcpd.conf...
> >>>> shared-network kab {
> >
> > Why do you have shared-network?
> >
> Can't remember why I did that so I just got rid of it. I added "option
> routers 192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1;" before the subnets at the top of
> the file and now I am getting the right default gateway.
Routers should be set in the "subnet" block, you shouldn't hand
192.168.1.1 as a possible router to hosts which are in 192.168.0.x.
> I got rid of the static routes, they were not working anyway. I must
> need to add something to pf to route between subnets 192.168.0/24 and
> 192.168.1.1/24 and visa-versa.
This is usually easy enough to work out. Add 'log' in relevant places
in pf.conf and watch tcpdump -neipflog0
